A Loathsome Crooked Hat
September 2, 2009
So Scotland has lost its buddy across the Atlantic. Since the Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi arrived in Libya several weeks ago, lauded by supporters at the airport flying the flags of St Andrew and wearing Jimmy-wigs, Scotland has been viewed by our cousins across the Pond as a friend of terrorism, a loathsome, crooked hat perched atop of England’s head.
Day after day, American animosity towards Scotland grows. Anti-Scottish websites are being created (good ones too with impressive Flash intros), more and more US movie goers are claiming that Roger Moore was the best James Bond, millions of disgruntled music fans are returning their Proclaimers albums, and synchronised bonfires are being lit across the States with DVD copies of ‘Loch Ness’ starring Ted Danson being tossed upon them with unrelenting fury.
In response to this unprecedented lambasting, the Scottish Parliament demanded that Justice Minister and vaudeville comedian Kenny McCaskill come to Holyrood and say exactly the same things that he had said earlier in the week but this time in front of a room full of opposition politicians who desperately wanted to be seen by the international community (and in particular, President Fonzie Obama) shaking their heads and tut-tutting.
Remaining defiant, Mr. McCaskill reiterated that his decision was based on the existing laws of release on compassionate grounds. However, he added that he had been appalled by the Beatleswelcome that al-Megrahi bathed himself in upon his return to Libya and had spoken with the Libyan authorities beforehand to ensure that such an occurrence would not happen.
The unavoidable and revelatory conclusion therefore appears to be that this dictatorial government with whom we have been working closely is not entirely trustworthy. Well, they better not screw us on the oil too, that’s all I can say.
The George Administration
June 26, 2009
The 44th President of the United States has a psychological hold upon us all which erodes our ability to criticise him. Nobody has been able to put their finger on it, until now.
There are many theories one could formulate about how his intellect and wisdom and oratory brilliance have created an impenetrable, invisible shield. One could argue that his leadership skills and political superstrength have bound us all together in an unshakable appreciation of his general fabulousness, causing our doubts about such troubling matters as the alleged torture of Bagram detainees to dribble away gently from our conscious minds.
However, the simplest reasoning actually lies with his name: ‘Obama’ sounds more like a first name and ‘Barack’ sounds more like a second name. Therefore, when we hear in the news of new measures being taken by the ‘Obama Administration’, it sounds a lot more friendly and personable and consequently we are more enthusiastic to whatever these new measures may be.
For instance, if we had heard that the ‘George Administration’ had announced its intention to embark on an illegal war because two buildings in New York fell down, I don’t think we would have kicked up such a fuss. And if the ‘Bill Administration’ had revealed that the President let a member of the White House staff play with his star-spangled wanger, we wouldn’t have battered an international eyelid.
It pays to not use your surname quite so readily. By switching his names over, Barack Obama has created a genius diversionary tactic unmatched by any politician. Obama Barack. Say it. You know it sounds better.



